Peer Review #2

One of my objections to going to BIRDIE was that the members couldn’t be depended on to enter their scores correctly.   I was told that was OK because it was peer reviewable.

Below are scores that were on the SMAF blog and the scores a member entered into BIRDIE.

SMAF Blog Birdie
2017-09-25 94 94
2017-09-28 89 89
2017-10-12 90 90 gold not gold tee
2017-10-14 94 94
2017-12-28 97 97
2017-12-30 84 84
2018-01-04 89 89
2018-01-06 91 91
2018-01-08 83 83
2018-02-03 94 94
2018-02-05 82 82
2018-02-10 81 81
2018-02-12 90 81 wrong score
2018-03-05 94 94
2018-03-08 85 85
2018-03-10 86 missing missing score
2018-03-12 81 81
2018-03-15 82 82
2018-08-21 84 84
2018-08-23 89 89
2018-08-25 95 missing missing score
2018-08-27 92 92
2018-08-27 92 92 duplicated score

This wasn’t as bad as Peer Review #1 which is here.

Advertisements